Understanding living systems, body design, and post-human possibilities through art and speculation
What if your body isn't a fixed biological given, but a designed space—something you can extend, modify, and reimagine? This is Madeline Schwartzman's provocation: treat the body like an architect treats a building.
For Schwartzman, wearables aren't just clothes or gadgets you put on. They're architectural interventions that change how you inhabit your body. A vest that translates sound to vibration doesn't just help deaf people hear—it gives them a completely new sensory architecture, where "hearing" happens through skin instead of ears.
Don't ask "what IS the body?" Ask "what COULD the body be?" How would you design your body if you could start from scratch? What rooms would it have? What senses? What capabilities?
Your psychological sense of "this is MY body" is surprisingly flexible. The Rubber Hand Illusion proves you can feel ownership of fake limbs. Could work for third arms too.
Your body's GPS—knowing where your limbs are without looking. It updates when you use tools. A hammer becomes part of your hand. What about permanent bio-tech extensions?
Your brain's mental model of your body adapts constantly. Musicians' instruments become body parts. Your body schema could include wings, tentacles, magnetic sense organs.
Not prosthetics to replace missing parts, but additions to enhance complete bodies. Stelarc's Third Hand didn't replace anything—it added new capability.
Projects: "See Yourself Sensing" (2011), "Alive: Advancements in Adaptive Architecture" (2025)
Approach: Designs wearables and environments that extend sensory and cognitive capabilities. Treats body boundaries as architectural problems—where does "you" end and "world" begin?
Ask yourself: If you could wear a new sense, what would it be? How would it change how you move through the world?
Global: Neri Oxman's "Wanderers" (wearable biomes).
India: Rise Bionics (Arun Cherian) uses Cane
(Rattan) to build high-performance prosthetics. It mimics the "spring" of human
muscle using natural material properties—perfect "Material Ecology."
India: NeoBolt (IIT Madras) reimagines the wheelchair not as a medical device, but as a personalized "motorized clip-on" vehicle. It empowers autonomy, transforming the user into a driver rather than a patient—true "Post-Human" design.
Design Note: Bio-design in India must avoid the trap of being "low-cost for the sake of it." Rise Bionics succeeds not just because it's cheap, but because cane is mechanically superior to plastic for that specific function. Aim for rigorous material science, not just aesthetic "Bio-Art."
What if materials could grow, heal, and respond like living things? This is Neri Oxman's "Material Ecology"—designing materials at the intersection of biology, computation, and fabrication.
Traditional design uses dead materials: metal, plastic, wood. Living materials are alive while you work with them. Mycelium grows into shapes. Bacterial cellulose weaves itself. Silkworms spin structures that humans can't predict.
Neri Oxman's breakthrough: don't design FOR nature or FROM nature. Design WITH living organisms as creative collaborators. You start the design; they finish it in ways you can't control.
Manufacturing using living organisms—bacteria, fungi, plants, animal cells. The material GROWS instead of being assembled. Suzanne Lee's kombucha leather jackets literally brew in jars.
Fungal root networks that can be grown into shapes, then dried into strong lightweight materials. Like nature's 3D printer—grows in days, biodegrades in months.
Living mat from kombucha tea culture. Harvested and dried into leather-like material. Kitchen-safe, flexible, customizable. Can grow it yourself in 2-4 weeks.
Stronger than steel by weight, made by biology. Grown in labs using genetically modified bacteria. Future of bio-textiles—imagine wearables tougher than kevlar, grown not woven.
Key Project: Silk Pavilion (2013) - A dome structure where 17,000 silkworms were placed after humans built the scaffold. The worms decided where to add silk, co-creating the final design.
Philosophy: "Material Ecology" integrates computational design, digital fabrication, materials science, and synthetic biology. Design at molecular AND architectural scale simultaneously.
Ask yourself: What would you grow? A chair? A jacket? A building? How would it feel to wear something that was once alive?
Why settle for five senses? Birds sense magnetic fields for navigation. Bats echolocate in darkness. Snakes see infrared heat signatures. Through wearable technology and sensory substitution, humans can access these hidden worlds.
The key insight: your brain doesn't care WHERE sensory information comes from. It just integrates whatever signals arrive. Vision doesn't have to come from eyes—it can come from a camera converted to vibrations on your tongue. Your brain learns to "see" through skin.
Every species lives in its own "umwelt"—the sensory world it experiences. Bees see UV patterns on flowers invisible to us. What's the umwelt of a moth? A dolphin? Bio-robotics wearables let us peek into other umwelts.
Converting one sense to another. Vision to touch. Sound to vibration. The brain adapts—eventually you stop translating and just perceive directly.
Sensing Earth's magnetic field like migrating birds. The feelSpace belt vibrates to point north. After weeks, users report intuitive directional sense—new qualia.
Seeing with sound like bats. Some blind humans learn this naturally. Wearables with ultrasonic clicks converted to haptic feedback could give anyone bat-like spatial awareness.
Crossed senses—seeing sounds as colors, tasting shapes. Usually neurological, but wearables can create artificial synesthesia. Neil Harbisson's antenna: colors become sounds.
Key Intervention: Antenna implanted in skull (2004) that converts light frequencies to audible vibrations. Born colorblind, now "hears" colors including infrared and ultraviolet.
Legal Status: First person legally recognized as a cyborg—antenna appears in passport photo.
Philosophy: Technology as sensory organ, not tool. The antenna is part of his body, not a device he wears. Challenges what counts as "natural" human senses.
Ask yourself: What sense would you add? How would it change what you notice in the world?
Art that breathes. Sculptures that need feeding. Living organisms created through genetic engineering as aesthetic and philosophical experiments. This is transgenic art—where biology becomes creative medium.
Eduardo Kac pioneered the form with GFP Bunny (2000): a rabbit genetically modified to glow green under blue light using jellyfish genes. Not a painting OF nature—a new form of nature itself. The artwork can die if you don't care for it properly.
If we can modify life, should we? Who decides what counts as ethical creation? Where's the line between healing disease and designing desire? Bio-art forces us to confront these questions tangibly.
Living beings with genes from other species. Kac's rabbit with jellyfish genes. Bacteria producing spider silk. Challenges species boundaries—what IS a rabbit anymore?
Growing living tissue (skin, organs, bones) in controlled conditions. Amy Karle's "Regenerative Reliquary" grows human hand bones from stem cells. Art? Medicine? Both?
Artworks that are alive—require vet care, feeding, temperature control. SymbioticA lab creates tissue-culture art. Museums must learn how to care for living works.
Bio-art deliberately raises uncomfortable questions. Is creating life for aesthetic purposes acceptable? Who consents—the artist? The organism? Where do we draw lines?
GFP Bunny "Alba" (2000): Rabbit with green fluorescent protein gene from Aequorea victoria jellyfish. Glows green under blue light. Lived in lab, never released to Kac.
"Natural History of the Enigma" (2009): Petunia flower with Kac's own DNA (gene for red blood cells). A flower that's part human. Challenges species identity.
Philosophy: Transgenic art as "new art form based on genetic engineering." Not illustrating biology but creating new biology as cultural expression.
Ask yourself: Would you make living art? Where would you draw ethical boundaries? What responsibility do you owe to life you create?
What if robots moved like octopuses instead of machines? What if they were made of silicone, fabric, and pneumatics—materials that bend and flex rather than hinge and pivot?
Soft robotics studies compliant, flexible systems inspired by biological organisms. No rigid joints. No metal skeletons. Instead: pneumatic muscles (air-powered), electroactive polymers (plastic that moves with electricity), and shape-memory materials (metals with muscle memory).
Soft robots are inherently safer—they can't crush you. More adaptable—they conform to irregular shapes. More wearable—they move with your body instead of against it. Think wearable exosuits made of fabric, not metal exoskeletons.
Muscles made of air and rubber. Inflatable tubes that bend like fingers when filled with air. Used in soft grippers that can hold eggs without breaking them.
Metals like nitinol that "remember" original shape. Bend them cold, heat them, and they spring back. Wire that contracts like muscle when warmed.
Fabric-based robotic clothing that assists movement. Harvard's soft exosuit helps people walk using textiles with cable actuators—closer to clothes than to armor.
Copying how animals move—crawling like caterpillars, undulating like jellyfish, gripping like octopuses. Millions of years of evolution solved problems we're just discovering.
Medical Robots: Continuum robots (no discrete joints) navigate curved body passages for minimally invasive surgery.
Assistive Wearables: Soft exosuits help people with mobility issues walk. Gentle, comfortable, doesn't restrict natural movement.
Research Labs: Harvard Biodesign Lab, MIT CSAIL, ETH Zurich Soft Robotics Lab—exploring soft systems for rehabilitation, exploration, human augmentation.
Ask yourself: Would you wear a soft robotic suit? What would you want it to help you do? Lift heavier? Walk farther? Swim faster?
"The body is obsolete." This is Stelarc's provocation. Why accept the limitations evolution gave us? Why not redesign ourselves deliberately through technology, modification, and enhancement?
Post-humanism argues humans are not a finished product. We're works in progress. Technology allows us to transcend biological constraints—adding senses, extending lifespans, merging with machines, evolving beyond "human" as we currently define it.
Does modifying our bodies make us less human or MORE human? Humans have always used technology—fire, tools, writing, glasses, pacemakers. Where do we draw the line between tool and transformation?
Cybernetic organisms—beings combining biological and technological parts. Not just science fiction. Anyone with pacemaker, cochlear implant, or insulin pump is technically a cyborg.
Deliberate alteration of body beyond cultural norms. Stelarc's Third Hand, Harbisson's antenna, subdermal implants for sensing NFC chips. Functional, not just aesthetic.
The right to modify your own body however you wish. If it's your body, shouldn't you decide what shape it takes? What senses it has? What capabilities?
Using design to explore "what if?" scenarios. Dunne & Raby's approach: create provocative prototypes that make people question assumptions about technology and humanity.
Third Hand (1980s-present): Robotic hand controlled by EMG signals from leg and abdomen muscles. Not replacing missing hand—ADDING a third one. Permanent attachment for performances.
"Ear on Arm" (2006-ongoing): Cell-cultivated ear surgically attached to forearm. Originally planned to include microphone and internet connection—a listening ear anyone could access.
Philosophy: "The body is obsolete." Technology allows us to redesign ourselves. Why accept biological limitations? Evolution is too slow—we can direct our own transformation.
Questions Raised: Should we enhance healthy bodies or only "fix" disabled ones? Who decides what counts as enhancement vs. necessary modification? Where does "human" end?
Bio-robotics isn't about mastering engineering formulas. It's about asking better questions:
The artists and designers in this field—Schwartzman, Oxman, Kac, Stelarc, Harbisson, Karle—aren't building products. They're building provocations. They're using biology and technology to make us question what it means to be alive, to be human, to be embodied.
Your body is not a fixed biological given. It's a design problem. What would you design?
Flashcards - 52 concepts to deepen
your understanding
Activities - Hands-on projects
and case studies
Field Kit - Resources, tools, and
DIY recipes
Readings - Curated books and
manifestos